What are Chemical Tankers – Types, Design And Regulations

A significant portion of the supply chain systems of world trade based on maritime transportation depend on commercial shipping, which carries cargo in liquid form.

When we think of liquid cargo, the foremost name that comes to mind is an oil tanker, a vessel carrying petroleum and natural gas-related products. Chemical tankers are another type of commercial vessel transporting bulk cargo in liquid form.

Chemical tankers, as the name suggests, are commercial cargo ships designated to carry chemical substances in bulk liquid form from one point to another. Chemicals are widely procured, distributed, supplied, processed, and consumed for various purposes, ranging from industrial to agricultural to domestic. 

chemical tanker ship

The chemical cargo contents can vary, but for all practical purposes, inorganic chemical products such as acids, alcohols, toluene, benzenes, and so on are most common. Other contents of chemical tankers include organic products for agricultural or domestic usage, organic or inorganic oils, some special chemical substances for medicinal usage, biofuels, etc. 

The philosophy of design encompassing chemical tankers is close to that of oil tankers and has the following chief considerations that act as cornerstones: 

  • The containment of liquid cargo in bulk quantities, like in oil tankers 
  • The cargo contents are usually very flammable, as these dangerous chemicals not only have a critically low flash point but are also highly reactive, leading to a great degree of risk associated with fire outbreaks. 
  • The highly reactive nature of the chemical contents that are can pose a great deal of risk when it comes to interference with the hull structure 
  • The purview of water and air pollution arising from accidental leaks or release of these substances into the environment, even in small quantities.   

A Brief About Design and Construction

Chemical tankers are, for all practical purposes, smaller than oil tankers, ranging from as low as 5000 tonnes deadweight tonnage to at most 50000-60000 DWT for the biggest sizes.

The small size of these vessels can be due to several factors, such as port restrictions for loading and discharging these noxious substances, channel voyage restrictions for passage of these dangerous chemicals, the specialised nature of the cargo, and, of course, the lesser demand for chemical transport compared to other similar conventional types like oil and gas or freight cargo in bulk. 

However, owing to the dangerous classification of liquid cargo in bulk that it carries from one point to another, the rules, guidelines, and codes dictating the design and construction of chemical tankers are more conservative than those of oil tankers. 

Generally, the hull form of chemical carriers is like that of other conventional bluff from commercial ships such as oil tankers or bulkers. They do not have high-speed requirements. They are driven mainly by heavy-duty diesel or diesel-electric propulsion systems that provide sufficient power to travel through all sea conditions and, simultaneously, provide a constant supply to facilitate the internal systems constantly running onboard. 

The main difference or typicality of chemical carriers arises from their internal structures, the cargo spaces, and the various systems running for the containment of such dangerous cargo in bulk that we shall discuss briefly. 

Codes and Rules

One of the most essential bases for chemical tankers carrying chemical substances is Annex-II of MARPOL itself (Regulations for the Control of Pollution by Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk), which governs the transport of noxious substances in any quantities across the sea.

Annex II of MARPOL technically defines chemical tankers as “vessels deemed to carry noxious liquid cargo in bulk quantities”, as defined in Chapter 17 of the International Bulk Chemical Code or IBC code, which is at the heart of the design and construction of chemical carriers. 

IBC is the set of rules, guidelines, codes, and advisories encompassing the transport of dangerous chemicals in bulk by sea. Thus, by default, ALL CHEMICAL TANKERS come under the purview of IBC. They are considered special requirements or extensions stemming from MARPOL Annex-II itself. 

IBC was initially adopted by both the Marine Safety Committee (MSC) and the Marine Environmental Safety Committee (MEPC) of IMO in 1983 and 1985 and came into effect in 1986. The last revision was in 2004.

Summary of regulation for chemical tankers

IBC officially supplants the Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk, or the BCH code, which applies to all chemical carriers built before 1/7/1986. However, in the present day, all such vessels dating back almost four decades are phased out, and IBC is the universally accepted code for new building and retrofitting projects of all chemical-carrying vessels. 

Also, BCH remains a special recommendation under the 1974 SOLAS convention (Chapter 7) and may be applied as an addition to IBC codes if required. 

Along with Annex II of MARPOL introducing the applicability of IBC codes, SOLAS Chapter VII of SOLAS, the other critical pillar of IMO guidelines, also mandates the importance of IBC and their relevance to the purview of chemical tankers.

Conversely, IBC and BCH also allude to the MARPOL and SOLAS in their respective chapters, highlighting the interconnectedness between the parent regulations and these special codes as elaborate standards explicitly dealing with the specific requirements for transporting hazardous chemical substances. 

Any change or amendments in the IMO regulations about these hazardous substances are reflected in these codes and vice-versa. 

In addition to the IBC, chemical tankers need to comply with the rules specified by the classification societies, all of which are based on the codes mentioned above. 

Thus, summarising, in a general sense, the following rules and framework usually govern the design and construction of chemical tankers: 

  • MARPOL Annex-II 
  • IBC Code for chemical cargo 
  • BCH (for old vessels and as and when required under 1974 SOLAS convention requirements) 
  • SOLAS (Ch VII) 
  • Class rules as required 

chemical tanker

Categorisation of noxious liquids and types of Chemical tankers based on IBC Code

The chemical contents of chemical carriers range widely from acids to alcohols, and elements like concentrate acids, alkanes, ethers, paraffins, etc., pose the highest risk. One of the most important bases for the development of the IBC codes is Chapter 2 (regulation 6) of MARPOL Annex-II, which categorises the noxious liquid substances to be transported by sea into three types: X, Y, and Z. 

These three categories are demarcated based on the degree of risks and potency, with X being the highest and Z being the least. Moreover, as per the rules, items falling outside this category are classed as OS or other substances. 

Now, in addition to this regulation and coupled with other crucial regulations of MARPOL Annex-II, like Regulation 13, which deals with the control and management of such noxious substances at sea, the IBC code derives influence and defines the framework for the design and construction of chemical tankers. 

Based on the risk index of these dangerous substances, the IBC code defines three categories of chemical tankers: 

  • Type 1: Ships carrying noxious substances of maximum hazard and survive maximum damage 
  • Type 2: Ships carrying substances of significant severity and environmental implications. 
  • Type 3: Ships carrying substances with the lowest severity but require containment. 

At this juncture, it is worth mentioning Chapter 17 of the IBC code, which clearly defines the inventory of substances permissible on all classed chemical tankers and categorically identifies the designated particulars like ship type (1,2 or 3) based on the cargo type (X, Y or Z). Other important details include tank type, required gauging, materials required, fire protection, and so on.

For example, Alkaryl Phosphate mixtures are considered highly critical and, thus, classed as a Cat. X (Column 1) substance is required to be specially transported on Type 1 ship (Column 3). Similarly, n-Alkanes are considered low-risk (Z) and must be carried on Type 3 ships. 

However, the category of substances does not necessarily correspond to the expected ship type.  For instance, Acetonitrile, despite being a Cat. Z substance is required to be carried on a Type 2 vessel instead of 3.

Characteristics of Chemical Tankers

For all practical purposes, different chapters and regulations of the IBC code dictate the design indices for chemical tankers. Without delving deeply into each of them, let us have a glance at some important characteristics of these vessels: 

Hull structure: All modern chemical tankers have a double-hull configuration in line with the regulatory requirements of SOLAS and MAPROL (special requirements like IBC and BCH catering to that). Cargo, like oil tankers, is stored in the central tanks only, and the wing double-bottom tanks are used for other utilities like freshwater, ballast, etc. 

Chemical tankers are, for all practical purposes, both longitudinally and transversely stiffened to accommodate not only all kinds of external and internal loads but also dynamic time-varying loads that may arise due to the erratic motions of the dense liquid chemical cargo. 

Another important trait of these vessels is that there are not many stiffeners in the way of the tanks to ease cleaning and minimise the accumulation of chemical residues. Transverse stiffening in the way of decks is provided instead to compensate. 

Subdivision and compartmentalisation: As these vessels carry high-risk cargo, they have higher subdivision per regulations to increase vessel survivability and minimise environmental damage due to spillage. 

Moreover, the higher degree of subdivision in the chemical tankers also aids in minimising problems like sloshing of the liquid cargo, which, in turn, can pose hazards like ignition due to heavy motions and frictional effects of the cargo contents with the holds and can also induce high transient pressure loads on the primary structural members.

Even the lowest deadweight chemical tankers are at least 2-compartment type, whereas, for an oil tanker, it is only when the length exceeds 150 m. 

Stability guidelines: Stability is important in these vessels as low stability characteristics can lead to severe problems like overheating and fire outbreaks arising from the excessive motions of the cargo, spillage, etc. The codes allow a maximum heel angle of 25-30 degrees, even under worst-case scenarios. 

Cargo, tankage, and general arrangements: This is one of the most crucial aspects of a chemical tanker. Chapters 2 and 3 of the IBC code mainly deal with the stowage and disposition of cargo, the internal arrangements, and how the holds or spaces are arranged in such vessels.

chemical tanker deck

The design and placement of the tanks consider the potential hazards of the cargo contents, how they can minimally hamper and affect the stability and upkeep of the vessel, and how they can be adequately cleaned and maintained after offloading operations. The openings in the way of the cargo holds are one of the most crucial aspects of tankers. 

These holds should be wide enough to allow for safer air circulation for any work underneath (like cleaning, maintenance, etc.) and, at the same time, act as airing holes for releasing any form of hazardous gaseous buildup from the chemical contents. However, in some instances, like in highly stressed areas like the bottom floor, these openings are again kept at a minimum to assuage any loss in global strength. 

For all practical purposes, the cargo tanks are filled to the maximum extent, but some clearance is also given to allow for aeration and prevent the buildup of excess pressure. 

There are mainly four main types of tanks in chemical tankers: i) Independent tanks, ii) integral tanks, iii) gravity tanks, and iv) pressure tanks. The utility of these types depends on the severity of the cargo stowed. However, independent tanks are the best for very hazardous chemicals with low flash points since they do not transfer heat to and from the cargo contents. 

Maintenance and stowage of cargo contents: IBC stresses the four most critical aspects central to such dangerous cargo types – a) inerting, b) padding and insulating, c) drying and temperature control, and d) ventilation. 

Inerting mainly involves introducing a constant supply of inert gases to the cargo and associated piping so that the risk of explosions due to reduced oxygen levels is minimal. Inert gases are distributed by pump sets that are kept at a constant rating. 

Next, the insulation part is very crucial. Multi-layer robust insulation material is used for cargo tanks in chemical carriers and is approved by recognised bodies. An eclectic range of materials are used, some common ones being polyurethane foam, mineral wool, perlite, and so on. 

Temperature control in chemical tankers is mainly done with the help of heating or cooling coils, as per the cargo’s requirement. Heating or cooling systems in these tankers are subject to stringent guidelines and are regularly maintained. Lastly, ventilation is an indispensable aspect when it comes to transporting hazardous materials. Various types of ventilation for chemical cargo are mentioned in Chapter 8 of the IBC Code. 

Materials: The materials for constructing chemical tankers are not very much highlighted in the IBC Code and are primarily in line with classification rules. Mild steel and stainless steel are two materials used for construction. While tankers designed to transport one type of chemical contents are easier to construct, those designated to carry multiple types of chemicals are complicated. 

The choice of materials used in the holds is dependent on the type of chemical contents. Austenitic grades of stainless steel, for example, are more resistant to corrosion and are thus used for highly reactive chemicals. Other breeds, like molybdenum-free ones, are more compatible with lesser corrosive chemicals. In chemical tankers, there is essentially a trade-off between the strength and the reactive nature of the chemicals. 

You might also like to read-

Disclaimer :
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Disclaimer :
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.


Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

[the_ad_group id=”451041″]