Shipping Industry Faces $200 Per Container Gap In Zero-Emission Transition
A 34-page study just released on the brink of COP28 examines the cost of zero-emission container ships, illuminating the annualised costs and the discrepancy in price per container between Chinese and transpacific coastal shipping.
The report by the UK-based UMAS highlights the significant initial cost differential between traditional fossil fuels and scalable zero-emission fuels (SZEF), taking into account variations within the SZEF options.
Under an optimistic fuel price scenario, the cost difference is estimated at $150 per TEU for green ammonia and $210 per TEU for green methanol on the transpacific route in 2030. These amounts increase to $350 per TEU for green ammonia and $450 per TEU for green methanol in a scenario with high fuel prices.
However, the report indicates that the cost gap is expected to close by 2050 with strong demand signals, willingness to pay the difference, and policy support. Cargo owners and other early adopters are essential in creating a market for shipping with no emissions.
UMAS consultant Camilo Perico underlined the importance of openly discussing the difficulties and having stakeholders pitch in to close the budget deficit.
According to the Total Cost of Operation approach, which considers both operational and vessel capex, operating a single SZEF vessel on the transpacific route would cost an extra $20–30 million annually by 2030.
The fuel costs range from $18 to $27 million in this. The TCO for vessels using methanol and green ammonia is anticipated to be two to four times higher in 2030.
Leaders in the shipping sector, including the CEOs of significant corporations, recently made a joint statement at COP28, asking the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to establish regulatory frameworks that will hasten the switch to green fuels and imposing a deadline for newbuilds powered solely by fossil fuels.
Reference: Splash
Disclaimer :
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Disclaimer :
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
Related Articles
- Cruise Ship Refuels With LNG For The First Time At Port Of Vancouver
- World’s First Biomethanol-Powered CTV Enters Offshore Wind Service
- Trump Reopens New England Marine Monument For Commercial Fishing
- Boat Collides With Ship In Arabian Gulf, Tries Hitting Others, Says UKMTO
- Indian Navy Receives ‘Most Silent Ship’ To Track Submarines In Shallow Seas
- Clean Shipping Groups Urge EU To Strengthen Policy After ‘Disappointing’ IMO Climate Deal
Related Articles
Subscribe To Our Newsletter
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and may receive occasional deal communications; you can unsubscribe anytime.
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT