Chinese Ship Suspected Of Damaging Subsea Cable Off Taiwan May Have Used 2 AIS Devices
Per Taiwan’s Coast Guard, the Chinese-owned vessel suspected of having damaged a subsea cable off Taiwan’s northern coast was using 2 different AIS transponders.
It happened on Friday around 1240 hours when Chungwha Telecom informed Taiwan’s Coast Guard Administration ( CGA) that a subsea communications cable was severed off the Keelung coast.
The cable was a part of the Trans-Pacific Express, a high-speed fibre optic cable connecting China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea and the U.S.
A Taiwan coast guard patrol boat intercepted the freighter Xing Shun 39 at 1700 hours, near the place where the cable had been broken.
The Coast Guard could not board the ship and instead of going to a Taiwanese port, the ship headed to South Korea’s Busan, leaving Taiwanese jurisdiction that same day.
The Coast Guard identified the ship as Shunxing-39, however, no reference to the ship was found in the records of the IMO.
This led the officials to believe that the freighter possibly used 2 different AIS devices and identities, its real name Xing Shun 39 and a similar fake name, Shunxing-39.
It switched back and forth to create a false and interrupted AIS record.
William Conroy, an analyst with Semaphore Maritime Solutions, said that the vessel seemed to switch AIS devices when asked by Taiwan CGA to stop for inspection.
He added that Sunxing-39 disappeared from AIS tracking at 1651 hours on Friday and Xing Shun appeared a minute later 50 feet away.
The freighter is not reachable to Taiwanese officials, but they have asked Busan’s port authorities to help them in gaining evidence from the ship when it arrives in South Korea.
The case will be sent to Keelung’s prosecutor’s office for possible criminal or civil actions against the ship.
Meanwhile, CGA will launch a review of its process to respond to potential cable sabotage incidents that involve ships to help it respond better in case something like this happens again. It is also coordinating with other agencies, officials told state news agency CNA.
References: New York Times
Disclaimer :
The information on this website is for general purposes only. While efforts are made to ensure accuracy, we make no warranties of any kind regarding completeness, reliability, or suitability. Any reliance you place on such information is at your own risk. We are not liable for any loss or damage arising from the use of this website.
Related Posts
eBooks you will like to read
Disclaimer :
The information on this website is for general purposes only. While efforts are made to ensure accuracy, we make no warranties of any kind regarding completeness, reliability, or suitability. Any reliance you place on such information is at your own risk. We are not liable for any loss or damage arising from the use of this website.
Related Articles
Latest News
Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletter
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and may receive occasional deal communications; you can unsubscribe anytime.
All ships have two AIS devices. In case one goes offline, the other one kicks in automatically.
The name is pretty much the same – maybe unintentionally programmed wrongly (maybe lost by translation in the alphabet). If it shows 1 minute later with the alternative name just few feet away, is also an indication that the gps was operative and accurate. How about the MMSI Number on both names? Was it the same? If yes, this is another proof. Maybe this can be found in the database of marine traffic for comparison.
Innocent until proven guilty, that is what the law should always follow.