Shipping Freight Rates Drop As Operators Wrestle With Overcapacity

reuters logo Shipping freight rates on the world’s busiest route, from Asia to Northern Europe, fell by the largest percentage amount since 2008, reflecting wild volatility in the market as vessel operators continue to wrestle with overcapacity.

Rates for transporting containers from Asia to Northern Europe plunged 32.5 percent to $444 per 20-foot container (TEU) in the week ended on Friday, a source with access to data from the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index told Reuters.

Shipping consultants Drewry reckon the Shanghai-Rotterdam and Shanghai-Genoa routes are the two most volatile among 11 that they track, with rates rising $1,000 or more per TEU over just a few weeks and then falling back down again.

Representation Image – Credits:

“The drop in freight rates is witness to the brutal price competition and there is a need for far more cuts in capacity,” analyst Jacob Pedersen from Sydbank said.

Shipping companies such as Maersk have said they wanted to increase rate dramatically on the spot market. Sometimes they succeed in applying such high freight rates and the index rises as it did by 150 percent in May.

Global leader Maersk Line said it intended to increase spot rates by $800 per TEU from June 1 and the world’s third-largest shipping group, France’s CMA CGM, said it wanted to boost rates by $1,000 from June.

But more often then not, these shipping giants are forced to accept far lower rates due to overcapacity — too many ships, not enough goods.

“The volatility of global spot freight rates since the start of 2015 has continued to increase in comparison to 2014,” Drewry wrote in a note.

In the week to Friday, container freight rates dropped 25.1 percent from Asia to ports in the Mediterranean, fell 7.0 percent to ports on the U.S. West Coast and were up 2.3 percent to ports on the U.S. East Coast.

A.P. Moller-Maersk Chief Executive Nils Smedegaard Andersen said last week Maersk Line would only sign long-term freight contracts if they were profitable. Otherwise, Maersk Line preferred to be exposed to the spot market.

(By Ole Mikkelsen, Editing by Sabina Zawadzki)

Copyright 2015 Thomson Reuters. Click here for Restrictions

Disclaimer :
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction

Latest Shipping News You Would Like:

Get the Latest Maritime News Delivered to Your Inbox!

Our free, fast, and fun newsletter on the global maritime industry, delivered everyday.

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *