Obama Pushes For More U.S. Ice-Breaking Might In Arctic

reuters logo President Barack Obama said on Tuesday the United States needs to quickly acquire at least one new heavy icebreaker for the U.S. Arctic, where melting sea ice has spurred more traffic and the United States has fallen far behind Russian resources.

The move, part of a push to convince Americans to support Obama’s plans to curb climate change, has long been urged by Arctic advocates as climate change opens up the region to more shipping, mining and oil drilling.

In the first step of Obama’s new timetable, the government would buy a heavy icebreaker by 2020 instead of the previous goal of 2022.

The United States used to have seven icebreakers. Russia currently has 40, with another 11 planned or under construction.

Ice-Breaker Ship
Image for representation purpose only

“Technically, we have three. Operationally, we really have only two,” Obama told reporters in the coastal town of Seward, named after Secretary of State William Seward, who negotiated the purchase of Alaska from Russia in 1867.

Obama will have to convince Congress to pick up the tab for any new icebreakers, each of which comes with a price tag of about $1 billion.

“The devil, as always, will be in the funding and procurement details,” said Heather Conley of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, who has studied the need for more Arctic icebreakers.

The region also needs enhanced navigation aids, satellite communications, deep water ports and other related investments not mentioned in the White House announcement, Conley noted.

At a time of dwindling big-ticket weapons programs, Obama’s announcement lays the groundwork for the U.S. Coast Guard to launch a competition to build a new icebreaker.

“Great powers should have the capabilities for playing a role in the theater,” said Malte Humpert, the head of the Arctic Institute, a think tank. “Russia is ready for anything that happens in the Arctic, and China is getting ready to have those capabilities.”

As the Arctic opens tourism and oil drilling, the United States risks not having enough capacity to carry out search and rescue and oil spill response missions.

Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc, which built the newest U.S. ice breaker and delivered it in 1999, said it was keen to bid on new hardened ships for the Coast Guard.

General Dynamics Corp, the other large U.S. military shipbuilder and a possible bidder in an ice breaker competition, said it was also very interested, and touted its expertise in manufacturing heavy- and medium-weight steel commercial ships.

The company that built the other existing U.S. icebreakers, Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction, has exited the business and its shipyard was shut down in 1988.

It usually takes up to 10 years to build an icebreaker. It was not immediately clear when any proposed new vessel might be ready.

The White House also said the government should start planning for additional vessels. The Coast Guard has previously recommended it needs eight icebreakers, although no administration budget has yet included the huge funding request.

Coast Guard officials have said other agencies will have to chip in to help finance the purchase of new icebreakers.

(By Roberta Rampton, Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal and Timothy Gardner in Washington, and Steve Quinn in Juneau, Alaska; Editing by Alan Crosby, Dan Grebler and Leslie Adler)

Copyright 2015 Thomson Reuters. Click here for Restrictions

Disclaimer :
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction

Latest Shipping News You Would Like:

Get the Latest Maritime News Delivered to Your Inbox!

Our free, fast, and fun newsletter on the global maritime industry, delivered everyday.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *