• Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Marine Tech
    • Air Compressor
    • Ship Generator
    • Oily Water Separator
    • Ship Stabilizer
    • Boiler
  • Navigation
    • Mooring
    • Watchkeeping
    • Maneuvering
    • Anchoring
    • Equipment
  • Maritime Law
  • More
    • Case Studies
    • Life At Sea
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Marine Careers
    • Naval Arch
    • Ship Safety
    • Shipboard Guidelines
    • Forums
    • Types of Ships
    • Financial Planning
    • Photos
    • Apps
  • Premium E-Books
  • Free E-Books
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Marine Tech
    • Air Compressor
    • Ship Generator
    • Oily Water Separator
    • Ship Stabilizer
    • Boiler
  • Navigation
    • Mooring
    • Watchkeeping
    • Maneuvering
    • Anchoring
    • Equipment
  • Maritime Law
  • More
    • Case Studies
    • Life At Sea
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Marine Careers
    • Naval Arch
    • Ship Safety
    • Shipboard Guidelines
    • Forums
    • Types of Ships
    • Financial Planning
    • Photos
    • Apps
  • Premium E-Books
  • Free E-Books

Marine Insight

The Maritime Industry Guide

You are here: Home › Case Studies › Real Life Accident: Hull Damage After Contact With Bunker Vessel

Real Life Accident: Hull Damage After Contact With Bunker Vessel

By MARS Reports | In: Case Studies | Last Updated on December 17, 2020

TwitterFacebookLinkedInPinterestBuffer

A tanker at anchor was preparing to moor a large bunker vessel on her port side to receive fuel. When she was nearly in position, (bow to bow configuration with both vessels’ sterns in line) the bunker vessel passed two stern lines to the tanker’s port quarter, where they were belayed on bitts. The lines were hove tight. Due to the absence of any lines forward, the bow of the bunker vessel canted away, causing the sterns of the two vessels to close.

Despite numerous attempts by the tanker’s crew to warn them, the crew and the bridge team on the bunker vessel failed to notice or react to the impending collision. The bunker vessel’s accommodation and quarter made several contacts with the tanker’s side shell. In order to avoid further impact damage, the bunker vessel was cast off and the fuel transfer operation was aborted. The next morning, following a review of the mooring manoeuvre and evaluation of the prevailing and expected sea conditions, it was decided to proceed with the fuel transfer operation.

Unfortunately, due to the bunker vessel’s slight residual headway, once again her sternlines tightened and drew her stern in towards the tanker, and both vessels sustained more contact damage in the stern regions. In this incident also, the bunker vessel was cast off and ordered to move away. Both incidents were reported to the office and other concerned parties, including the classification society to survey the damage. On the third attempt, the vessels safely moored alongside each other, and the bunkering operation was completed without further incident.

Result of investigation

1 There was no evidence of fatigue as all involved were found to have had sufficient rest;
2 An alcohol test was carried out soon after the incident with negative results;
3 All personnel involved were found to have sufficient experience in ship-to-ship (STS) operations and bunkering;
4 The bunker vessel was permanently equipped with three pneumatic rubber fenders along her parallel body. They were later considered to be too small for the vessel’s size;

hull damagehull damage
5 The bunker vessel’s mooring lines were on reels. Once tightened and the winch declutched, these prevented the crew from working the ropes quickly;
6 A replay of voyage data recorder (VDR) data showed that the bunker vessel repeatedly failed to respond to calls over the radio, especially in the critical final stages of mooring operations.

Root cause/contributory factors

1 Substandard conditions: Inadequate equipment. Subsequent expert opinion confirmed that, considering the size of the bunker tanker, the fenders were too small and there were not enough of them, especially for STS operations in open anchorages;
2 Substandard acts / practices: Poor planning / execution of the mooring manoeuvre. The combination of securing the sternlines first, improper monitoring and residual forward movement of the bunker vessel significantly contributed to the incidents;
3 Inadequate work planning: The size of the bunker vessel required more detailed hazard analysis and planning for the mooring operation so that more effective control measures could have been implemented;
4 Inefficient communications: Apart from lack of proper discussion of the proposed mooring manouevres, there was a complete breakdown in communication between the two vessels at the most critical times;
5 System failures: Insufficient guidance in company’s procedures. It was established that the company’s procedures lacked sufficient information for this operation to be performed more effectively.

Corrective/preventative actions

1 Procedures in the SMS revised to:
i. Enhance the safety and efficiency of STS and bunkering operations;
ii. Improve risk assessment techniques for bunker transfer from bunker barges and bunker tankers at anchorages;
iii. Provide guidelines for better mooring planning and execution;
iv. Recommend means for more efficient communications between vessels.
2 A fleet bulletin was circulated to share the lessons learnt from the incident;
3 Incident to be included in officers’ pre-boarding familiarisation;
4 An external training program in marine resources management (MRM) has been implemented for officers;
5 A fleet-wide campaign for improving behavioural safety and introducing concepts like ‘Take 5’ and ‘Stop Work’ has been started;
6 All ships provided with software for proper planning and risk evaluation for STS and bunkering operations;
7 The incident to be included as a case study in the company’s risk management training programme.

Reference & Image Credits: nautinst

Report an Error

Related Posts

Vessel Collision Off Swedish Coast
British Seafarer Held In Custody For Two More Weeks | Vessel Collision Off Swedish Coast Update
cruise ship
Real Life Incident: Cruise Ship Loses Both Its Anchors Within A Day
Barge Capsizes After Collision With LPG Vessel
Barge Capsizes After Collision With LPG Vessel, Two Million Litres Of Gasoline Lost
maritime pilot ladder
Real Life Incident: Man Overboard While Rigging The Pilot Ladder

Tags: collision real life accident vessel damage

Want to share your tips and advice? Got questions? Visit the community forum to ask questions, get answers, meet people, and share your tips!

About MARS Reports

The Mariners' Alerting and Reporting Scheme is primarily a confidential reporting system run by The Nautical Institute to allow full reporting of accidents (and near misses) without fear of identification or litigation. MARS reports also regularly comprise alerts condensed from official industry sources, so that issues resulting from recent incidents can be efficiently relayed to the mariner on board.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Now

road in pacific ocean brighter

Watch: Mysterious “Yellow Brick Road” Discovered In The Pacific Ocean

Turkish ship fire

Turkish Seafarer Passes Away Due To Fire On Bridge Of Cargo Ship

all women crew vessel

Photos: All-Women Crew Embarks On An Expedition – International Day For Women In Maritime

Russian Ships With Alleged Stolen Grains From Ukraine Reaches Syria

freight ship

How to Calculate Ocean Freight Charges?

Marine Engineering

  • Marine engine
  • Air compressor
  • Marine boiler
  • Oily water separator
  • Marine Electrical
  • Ship Generator
  • Oily water separator

Nautical Science

  • Mooring
  • Bridge Watchkeeping
  • Ship Manoeuvring
  • Nautical Charts
  • Anchoring
  • Nautical Equipment
  • Shipboard Guidelines

Explore

  • Free Maritime eBooks
  • Premium Maritime eBooks
  • Marine Safety
  • Financial Planning
  • Marine Careers
  • Maritime Law
  • Ship Dry Dock

More

  • Shipping News
  • Maritime Reports
  • Videos
  • Maritime Piracy
  • Offshore
  • Safety Of Life At Sea (SOLAS)
  • MARPOL
  Privacy Policy   |   Refund Policy   |   Contact Us  |   Disclaimer   |   About Us   |   Team   |   Advertise  |   Send Us News

Copyright © 2010 - 2022 Marine Insight — All Rights Reserved | Made with ♥ in India DMCA.com Protection Status

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website