Chinese Ship Suspected Of Damaging Subsea Cable Off Taiwan May Have Used 2 AIS Devices
Per Taiwan’s Coast Guard, the Chinese-owned vessel suspected of having damaged a subsea cable off Taiwan’s northern coast was using 2 different AIS transponders.
It happened on Friday around 1240 hours when Chungwha Telecom informed Taiwan’s Coast Guard Administration ( CGA) that a subsea communications cable was severed off the Keelung coast.
The cable was a part of the Trans-Pacific Express, a high-speed fibre optic cable connecting China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea and the U.S.
A Taiwan coast guard patrol boat intercepted the freighter Xing Shun 39 at 1700 hours, near the place where the cable had been broken.
The Coast Guard could not board the ship and instead of going to a Taiwanese port, the ship headed to South Korea’s Busan, leaving Taiwanese jurisdiction that same day.
The Coast Guard identified the ship as Shunxing-39, however, no reference to the ship was found in the records of the IMO.
This led the officials to believe that the freighter possibly used 2 different AIS devices and identities, its real name Xing Shun 39 and a similar fake name, Shunxing-39.
It switched back and forth to create a false and interrupted AIS record.
William Conroy, an analyst with Semaphore Maritime Solutions, said that the vessel seemed to switch AIS devices when asked by Taiwan CGA to stop for inspection.
He added that Sunxing-39 disappeared from AIS tracking at 1651 hours on Friday and Xing Shun appeared a minute later 50 feet away.
The freighter is not reachable to Taiwanese officials, but they have asked Busan’s port authorities to help them in gaining evidence from the ship when it arrives in South Korea.
The case will be sent to Keelung’s prosecutor’s office for possible criminal or civil actions against the ship.
Meanwhile, CGA will launch a review of its process to respond to potential cable sabotage incidents that involve ships to help it respond better in case something like this happens again. It is also coordinating with other agencies, officials told state news agency CNA.
References: New York Times
Disclaimer :
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Disclaimer :
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
Related Articles
- US Plans 100% Tariffs On Chinese-Made Port Cranes To Tackle Security Risks
- India’s Largest Port Operator Acquires 50 MTP NQXT Terminal In Australia
- Study Reveals Over Half Of Scotland’s Coastal Vessels Go Untracked
- Japan Installs Electromagnetic Railgun On Naval Test Ship For Sea Trials
- US Accuses Chinese Satellite Firm Of Helping Houthis Strike Ships In Red Sea
- U.S Coast Guard’s Only Heavy-Class Icebreaker Undergoes Last Stage of Life Extension Program
All ships have two AIS devices. In case one goes offline, the other one kicks in automatically.
The name is pretty much the same – maybe unintentionally programmed wrongly (maybe lost by translation in the alphabet). If it shows 1 minute later with the alternative name just few feet away, is also an indication that the gps was operative and accurate. How about the MMSI Number on both names? Was it the same? If yes, this is another proof. Maybe this can be found in the database of marine traffic for comparison.
Innocent until proven guilty, that is what the law should always follow.