What were T-2 Tanker Ships?

One very famous variant of tanker ships during the early days of shipping and at the time of world war were the T-2 tankers.

Constructed as per a vast scale commissioning order placed by the United States’ navy during the Second World War, these tanker ships were designed to be utilised as both oil carrying cargo vessels and, if necessary, as naval vessels too. Statistically quoting, it is said that almost 500 such T2 tanker vessels were built and operated in four different variegated classifications, each with a slight modulation as compared to its predecessor.

Concept Background

The idea generation to build cargo vessels like the T2 tankers was adopted from a couple of oil cargo vessels built for a shipping conglomerate in the late 1930s. Known as the Mobifuel and the Mobilube, these two vessels differed from their contemporaries in that, that they were constructed with a primary intent to offer enhanced transition speed.

T-2 Tanker Ship

Accordingly, the first cadre of the T2 navy tanker ships were commissioned with strict guidelines and stipulations about their size and their gross tonnage. This aspect about size and gross tonnage though differed on each of the variation of the T2 tanker vessels.

T2 Categorisation: The first categorisation in the T2 class of vessels, the T2 tanker ships had a length of almost 153 metres and a width of almost 21 metres. With a gross tonnage of 9,900 tonnes and a DWT (dead weight tonnage) of almost 16,000 tonnes, the T2 ships could move at speeds of 16 knots.

T2-A Categorisation: The T2-A version of the tanker ships had a length of slightly over 160 metres with a gross tonnage of over 10,000 tonnes and a DWT of over 16,000 tonnes. These vessels offered higher speed as compared to the original T2 ship variants. A totality of five T2-A vessels were commissioned, by a shipping company – the Keystone Tankship Corporation, though the final ownership was taken by the US naval department.

T2- SE-A1: T2-A was followed by T2-SE-A1 vessels. While categorising under the broader terminology of T-2 tanker ships, it’s the T2-SE-A1 categorisation that was the most common variant, with over 480 vessels launched. Ships under this classification had a length of 159 metres with a beam of almost 21 metres while their gross tonnage and the DWT of the ships were over 10,000 and over 16,500 tonnes respectively. The T2-SE-A1 vessels were propelled through electric turbines and offered speeds of 15 knots with a nautical mile range of over 12,000.

T-2 Tanker Ship

These vessels have been known to have the fastest constructional and outfitting gestational period. Considering the highly volatile situation on account of the Japanese attack on the American base at Pearl Harbour, the naval authorities were keen to have as many vessels on the get-go as possible. The functional success of this T2 classification is testimony to their constructional speed and urgency.

The T2-SE-A2 and T2-SE-A3 were the latter occurring constructional marvels under the T2 cadre. Both these variants had similar structural dimensions, with an almost similar speed providing, though unlike the former, the latter T2 class vessels were constructed to cater only as oil carrying cargo ships.

Vessels’ Problems

The uniqueness of these tanker vessels however stems from the fact that they were highly economised with constructional costs lowered to then hitherto proportions. And while the reduced costs of construction were beneficial in one way, they caused many problems to the vessels’ operability.

T-2 Tanker Ship

The lowered constructional costs manifested through the structuring and the usage of materials, leading to the vessels being unusable in winter conditions. This was proved by an independent research conducted by a US Maritime Panel. The panel attested and concluded that mobilisation of the vessels in winter conditions would have induced the vessels to be divided into two halves. This deficiency in the vessels’ structuring was rectified by buckling the vessels with steel strips.

Irrespective of these negativities it cannot be argued that the T2 tanker ships have played a pivotal role in shaping the American marine history, both during and after the Second World War. Following the conclusion of the war, while many ships were re-fitted to be used as cargo vessels, several of them were kept as a part of the naval reserve fleet. This is perhaps the most noteworthy and mentionable facet of these vessels’ unique and singular existence.

Reference

t2tanker, mariners-l, aukevisser

Image Credits

t2tanker, photobucket, lago-colony

Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction

Article Footer Banner

Subscribe To Our Newsletters

By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and may receive occasional deal communications; you can unsubscribe anytime.

One Comment

  1. Hello,

    I am seeking information on three tankers which so far has been hard to come by. I happened upon your pages and, while these vessels are not listed there, I am taking a stab in the dark that you might know the information I seek, or know where to direct me to get it.

    It is information on three Sinclair oil tankers, which were not Type T2 but rather custom built. I have so far found their names, that they were built in 1941 in Quincy, MA, at the Fore River shipyard, and that they had Armed Guard detachments during WWII, indicating that they had some armament.

    The vessels are the Sinclair Opaline, the Sinclair Rubilene, and the Sinclair Superflame. I want to know for all three their
    total barrels or gallons of cargo which they could carry
    net and gross registered tonnage
    maximum and cruising speeds
    specific armament
    I have this additional information from NavSource:

    Hull No. 1488 Sinclair Opaline 471′ Tanker Sinclair Refining Co. New 16 Aug 1941
    Hull No. 1489 Sinclair Rubilene 471′ Tanker Sinclair Refining Co. New 20 Sept 1941
    Hull No. 1490 Sinclair Superflame 471′ Tanker Sinclair Refining Co. New 7 Nov 1941

    I do appreciate your assistance, and any information which you can provide.

    Sincerely,

    John Heim

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *